Reframing climate justice: A three-dimensional view on just climate negotiations
T Kortetmäki - Ethics, Policy & Environment, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
Ethics, Policy & Environment, 2016•Taylor & Francis
This article proposes reframing the justice discourse in climate negotiations. In so doing, it
makes two claims. First, global climate negotiations deserve to be addressed as an issue of
justice on their own due to their peculiar characteristics. Second, a multidimensional theory
of justice is superior to distributional theories for this task. To support these arguments, I
apply the multidimensional theory of justice to global climate negotiations. This analysis
reveals that injustice in the negotiations is multidimensional and irreducible to distributional …
makes two claims. First, global climate negotiations deserve to be addressed as an issue of
justice on their own due to their peculiar characteristics. Second, a multidimensional theory
of justice is superior to distributional theories for this task. To support these arguments, I
apply the multidimensional theory of justice to global climate negotiations. This analysis
reveals that injustice in the negotiations is multidimensional and irreducible to distributional …
Abstract
This article proposes reframing the justice discourse in climate negotiations. In so doing, it makes two claims. First, global climate negotiations deserve to be addressed as an issue of justice on their own due to their peculiar characteristics. Second, a multidimensional theory of justice is superior to distributional theories for this task. To support these arguments, I apply the multidimensional theory of justice to global climate negotiations. This analysis reveals that injustice in the negotiations is multidimensional and irreducible to distributional questions. Furthermore, it shows how promoting justice in this broad sense would have significant effect on the negotiation procedures and substantive outcomes.
Taylor & Francis Online以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果