State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?
EA Dodson, KA Stamatakis, S Chalifour… - Journal of Public …, 2013 - journals.lww.com
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2013•journals.lww.com
Objective: The objective of this analysis was to examine various factors that may influence
state legislators' decisions about which health issues they address. Design: Cross-sectional
analysis of data collected from a randomized trial. Setting: State legislatures. Participants:
State-level legislators. Main Outcome Measure (s): Measures included a rating of the
influence of various factors on health policy priorities. A 7-point scale was used to measure
political ideology on social and fiscal issues. Standard demographic questions were …
state legislators' decisions about which health issues they address. Design: Cross-sectional
analysis of data collected from a randomized trial. Setting: State legislatures. Participants:
State-level legislators. Main Outcome Measure (s): Measures included a rating of the
influence of various factors on health policy priorities. A 7-point scale was used to measure
political ideology on social and fiscal issues. Standard demographic questions were …
Objective:
The objective of this analysis was to examine various factors that may influence state legislators' decisions about which health issues they address.
Design:
Cross-sectional analysis of data collected from a randomized trial.
Setting:
State legislatures.
Participants:
State-level legislators.
Main Outcome Measure (s):
Measures included a rating of the influence of various factors on health policy priorities. A 7-point scale was used to measure political ideology on social and fiscal issues. Standard demographic questions were included on age, gender, and level of education.
Results:
Seventy-five legislators completed surveys. Sixty-three percent were aged 55 years or older, and 76% male. When they were asked to rate factors according to importance in determining what health issues to work on, the top-rated factor was constituents' needs or opinions followed by evidence of scientific effectiveness. Ratings were also examined by subgroups.
Conclusions:
These findings point to several important applications for public health practitioners and researchers. Because legislators value constituents' opinions, it is critical to inform and educate constituents about public health issues as well as policy options that may be effective in addressing problems. The results also highlight the importance of public health researchers and practitioners improving dissemination efforts to ensure that evidence-based scientific information is shared with policymakers in an effective and timely manner.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果