Survival outcomes associated with clinical and pathological response following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in resected …

FI Macedo, E Ryon, SK Maithel, RM Lee… - Annals of …, 2019 - journals.lww.com
FI Macedo, E Ryon, SK Maithel, RM Lee, DA Kooby, RC Fields, WG Hawkins, G Williams
Annals of surgery, 2019journals.lww.com
Objective: To compare the survival outcomes associated with clinical and pathological
response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (NAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FLX) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) followed
by curative-intent pancreatectomy. Background: Newer multiagent NAC regimens have
resulted in improved clinical and pathological responses in PDAC; however, the effects of
these responses on survival outcomes remain unknown. Methods: Clinicopathological and …
Abstract
Objective:
To compare the survival outcomes associated with clinical and pathological response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FLX) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GNP) followed by curative-intent pancreatectomy.
Background:
Newer multiagent NAC regimens have resulted in improved clinical and pathological responses in PDAC; however, the effects of these responses on survival outcomes remain unknown.
Methods:
Clinicopathological and survival data of PDAC patients treated at 7 academic medical centers were analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (L-RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) associated with biochemical (CA 19–9 decrease≥ 50% vs< 50%) and pathological response (complete, pCR; partial, pPR or limited, pLR) following NAC.
Results:
Of 274 included patients, 46.4% were borderline resectable, 25.5% locally advanced, and 83.2% had pancreatic head/neck tumors. Vein resection was performed in 34.7% and 30-day mortality was 2.2%. R0 and pCR rates were 82.5% and 6%, respectively. Median, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 32 months, 46.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. OS, L-RFS, and MFS were superior in patients with marked biochemical response (CA 19–9 decrease≥ 50% vs< 50%; OS: 42.3 vs 24.3 months, P< 0.001; L-RFS-27.3 vs 14.1 months, P= 0.042; MFS-29.3 vs 13 months, P= 0.047) and pathological response [pCR vs pPR vs pLR: OS-not reached (NR) vs 40.3 vs 26.1 months, P< 0.001; L-RFS-NR vs 24.5 vs 21.4 months, P= 0.044; MFS-NR vs 23.7 vs 20.2 months, P= 0.017]. There was no difference in L-RFS, MFS, or OS between patients who received FLX or GNP.
Conclusion:
This large, multicenter study shows that improved biochemical, pathological, and clinical responses associated with NAC FLX or GNP result in improved OS, L-RFS, and MFS in PDAC. NAC with FLX or GNP has similar survival outcomes.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果