The choice of tradition and the tradition of choice: Habermas' and Rorty's interpretation of pragmatism
L Koczanowicz - Philosophy & Social Criticism, 1999 - journals.sagepub.com
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 1999•journals.sagepub.com
The paper is aimed at discussing two interpretations of pragmatism in a broader framework
of general rules of philosophical interpretation. J. Habermas' and R. Rorty's uses of
pragmatism are considered in detail and confronted with general assumptions of pragmatic
philosophy. It is shown that in both cases the original ideas of pragmatism are changed in
order to fit the philosophies of interpreters. The paper ends with discussion of a possibility of
applying the rule of interpretative charity and dialogue to philosophical analyses.
of general rules of philosophical interpretation. J. Habermas' and R. Rorty's uses of
pragmatism are considered in detail and confronted with general assumptions of pragmatic
philosophy. It is shown that in both cases the original ideas of pragmatism are changed in
order to fit the philosophies of interpreters. The paper ends with discussion of a possibility of
applying the rule of interpretative charity and dialogue to philosophical analyses.
The paper is aimed at discussing two interpretations of pragmatism in a broader framework of general rules of philosophical interpretation. J. Habermas’ and R. Rorty’s uses of pragmatism are considered in detail and confronted with general assumptions of pragmatic philosophy. It is shown that in both cases the original ideas of pragmatism are changed in order to fit the philosophies of interpreters. The paper ends with discussion of a possibility of applying the rule of interpretative charity and dialogue to philosophical analyses.
Sage Journals以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果