The judgement of research quality: a response to John Smith

G Tenenbaum, S Razon, B Thompson… - … research in sport and …, 2009 - Taylor & Francis
The paper by John Smith (2009) relies on the assumption that positivists' pro-Popperian
methodology of making science is historically rooted in some kind of a social-political-
religious conspiracy aimed at exhibiting power of respective institutions. It remains, however,
the mainstream methodology today though it is not explicitly claimed to be attributed to the
same reasons. The conclusions of the article are somewhat different from sharing the
'conspiracy theory', and are based more on familial experiences, and their personal …

[PDF][PDF] The judgement of research quality: a response to John Smith

I Basevitch - 2009 - researchgate.net
The paper by John Smith (2009) relies on the assumption that positivists' pro-Popperian
methodology of making science is historically rooted in some kind of a social-political-
religious conspiracy aimed at exhibiting power of respective institutions. It remains, however,
the mainstream methodology today though it is not explicitly claimed to be attributed to the
same reasons. The conclusions of the article are somewhat different from sharing the
'conspiracy theory', and are based more on familial experiences, and their personal …
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果