The risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants compared …

OY Bang, YK On, MY Lee, SW Jang, S Han, S Han… - PLoS …, 2020 - journals.plos.org
OY Bang, YK On, MY Lee, SW Jang, S Han, S Han, MM Won, YJ Park, JM Lee, HY Choi…
PLoS One, 2020journals.plos.org
Background Although randomized trials provide a high level of evidence regarding the
efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the results of such trials may differ
from those observed in day-to-day clinical practice. Aims To compare the risk of
stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between NOAC and warfarin in
clinical practice. Methods Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who started
warfarin/NOACs between January 2015 and November 2016 were retrospectively identified …
Background
Although randomized trials provide a high level of evidence regarding the efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the results of such trials may differ from those observed in day-to-day clinical practice.
Aims
To compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between NOAC and warfarin in clinical practice.
Methods
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who started warfarin/NOACs between January 2015 and November 2016 were retrospectively identified from Korea’s nationwide health insurance claims database. Using inpatient diagnosis and imaging records, the Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for NOACs relative to warfarin.
Results
Of the 48,389 patients, 10,548, 11,414, 17,779 and 8,648 were administered apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Many patients had suffered prior strokes (36.7%, 37.7%, 31.4%, and 32.2% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), exhibited high CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8, 4.6, 4.6, and 4.1 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) and HAS-BLED (3.7, 3.6, 3.6, and 3.3 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) scores, had received antiplatelet therapy (75.4%, 75.7%, 76.8%, and 70.1% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), or were administered reduced doses of NOACs (49.8%, 52.9%, and 42.8% in apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban group, respectively). Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a significantly lower S/SE risk [HR, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.62, 0.54–0.71; 0.60, 0.53–0.69; and 0.71, 0.56–0.88, respectively] than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran (HR, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.51–0.66 and 0.75, 0.60–0.95, respectively), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.69–1.04), showed a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.
Conclusions
Among Asian patients who were associated with higher bleeding risk, low adherence, and receiving reduced NOAC dose than that provided in randomised controlled trials, all NOACs were associated with a significantly lower S/SE risk and apixaban and dabigatran with a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.
PLOS
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果