Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort

A Shenhav, S Musslick, F Lieder, W Kool… - Annual review of …, 2017 - annualreviews.org
Annual review of neuroscience, 2017annualreviews.org
In spite of its familiar phenomenology, the mechanistic basis for mental effort remains poorly
understood. Although most researchers agree that mental effort is aversive and stems from
limitations in our capacity to exercise cognitive control, it is unclear what gives rise to those
limitations and why they result in an experience of control as costly. The presence of these
control costs also raises further questions regarding how best to allocate mental effort to
minimize those costs and maximize the attendant benefits. This review explores recent …
In spite of its familiar phenomenology, the mechanistic basis for mental effort remains poorly understood. Although most researchers agree that mental effort is aversive and stems from limitations in our capacity to exercise cognitive control, it is unclear what gives rise to those limitations and why they result in an experience of control as costly. The presence of these control costs also raises further questions regarding how best to allocate mental effort to minimize those costs and maximize the attendant benefits. This review explores recent advances in computational modeling and empirical research aimed at addressing these questions at the level of psychological process and neural mechanism, examining both the limitations to mental effort exertion and how we manage those limited cognitive resources. We conclude by identifying remaining challenges for theoretical accounts of mental effort as well as possible applications of the available findings to understanding the causes of and potential solutions for apparent failures to exert the mental effort required of us.
Annual Reviews
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果