Two versus one high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation session per day for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized sham-controlled trial
The journal of ECT, 2017•journals.lww.com
Objectives High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) has
proven antidepressant effects, but the optimal frequency of sessions remains unclear.
Methods We conducted a 3-week, sham-controlled trial to assess the antidepressant efficacy
of 1 active HF-rTMS session per day (A1 group) compared with 2 per day (A2 group) and
equivalent sham sessions (once a day, S1 group; twice a day, S2 group) in patients with
treatment-resistant major depression with a subsequent 2-week follow-up period. One …
proven antidepressant effects, but the optimal frequency of sessions remains unclear.
Methods We conducted a 3-week, sham-controlled trial to assess the antidepressant efficacy
of 1 active HF-rTMS session per day (A1 group) compared with 2 per day (A2 group) and
equivalent sham sessions (once a day, S1 group; twice a day, S2 group) in patients with
treatment-resistant major depression with a subsequent 2-week follow-up period. One …
Abstract
Objectives
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) has proven antidepressant effects, but the optimal frequency of sessions remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted a 3-week, sham-controlled trial to assess the antidepressant efficacy of 1 active HF-rTMS session per day (A1 group) compared with 2 per day (A2 group) and equivalent sham sessions (once a day, S1 group; twice a day, S2 group) in patients with treatment-resistant major depression with a subsequent 2-week follow-up period. One hundred seventy-seven patients were screened, of whom 105 met eligibility criteria and 98 consented and were randomized. The HF-rTMS (20 Hz) was targeted to the left prefrontal cortex in sessions of approximately 40 trains (2 seconds each) at 100% resting motor threshold with an intertrain interval of 1 minute. Treatment response was defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score and/or Clinician Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score of 3 or less. Remission was defined as HDRS score less than 8 and/or CGI-S score of 2 or less.
Results
Practically none of the subjects in either sham groups achieved remission. Increased odds of remission were present for CGI-S by stimulating twice rather than once per day (odds ratio [OR]= 1.5, P= 0.018), whereas there was a marginal result for HDRS (OR= 3.9, P= 0.066). Patients who had lower baseline HDRS (OR= 0.75, P= 0.014) and CGI-S scores (OR= 0.18, P= 0.001) were more likely to achieve remission.
Conclusions
Twice per day active HF-rTMS might be more effective than once per day active HF-rTMS or sham stimulation.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果