Weak-lensing mass calibration of ACTPol Sunyaev–Zel'dovich clusters with the hyper suprime-cam survey
H Miyatake, N Battaglia, M Hilton… - The Astrophysical …, 2019 - iopscience.iop.org
The Astrophysical Journal, 2019•iopscience.iop.org
We present weak-lensing measurements using the first-year data from the Hyper Suprime-
Cam Strategic Survey Program on the Subaru telescope for eight galaxy clusters selected
through their thermal Sunyaev–Zel'dovich (SZ) signal measured at 148 GHz with the
Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter experiment. The overlap between the two
surveys in this work is 33.8 square degrees, before masking bright stars. The signal-to-noise
ratio of individual cluster lensing measurements ranges from 2.2 to 8.7, with a total of 11.1 …
Cam Strategic Survey Program on the Subaru telescope for eight galaxy clusters selected
through their thermal Sunyaev–Zel'dovich (SZ) signal measured at 148 GHz with the
Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter experiment. The overlap between the two
surveys in this work is 33.8 square degrees, before masking bright stars. The signal-to-noise
ratio of individual cluster lensing measurements ranges from 2.2 to 8.7, with a total of 11.1 …
Abstract
We present weak-lensing measurements using the first-year data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Strategic Survey Program on the Subaru telescope for eight galaxy clusters selected through their thermal Sunyaev–Zel'dovich (SZ) signal measured at 148 GHz with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter experiment. The overlap between the two surveys in this work is 33.8 square degrees, before masking bright stars. The signal-to-noise ratio of individual cluster lensing measurements ranges from 2.2 to 8.7, with a total of 11.1 for the stacked cluster weak-lensing signal. We fit for an average weak-lensing mass distribution using three different profiles, a Navarro–Frenk–White profile, a dark-matter-only emulated profile, and a full cosmological hydrodynamic emulated profile. We interpret the differences among the masses inferred by these models as a systematic error of 10%, which is currently smaller than the statistical error. We obtain the ratio of the SZ-estimated mass to the lensing-estimated mass (the so-called hydrostatic mass bias 1− b) of
iopscience.iop.org