Zoom imaging for rapid aortic vessel wall imaging and cardiovascular risk assessment
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2011•Wiley Online Library
Purpose: To demonstrate the utility of a “reduced field‐of‐view”(zoom imaging) technique to
accelerate free‐breathing, ECG‐triggered, turbo‐spin‐echo black‐blood sequences, which
have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and
Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta.
Imaging with the conventional full field‐of‐view sequence was compared with zoom
imaging. Total scan time, image quality (ie, contrast‐to‐noise ratio and vessel wall …
accelerate free‐breathing, ECG‐triggered, turbo‐spin‐echo black‐blood sequences, which
have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Materials and
Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta.
Imaging with the conventional full field‐of‐view sequence was compared with zoom
imaging. Total scan time, image quality (ie, contrast‐to‐noise ratio and vessel wall …
Purpose
To demonstrate the utility of a “reduced field‐of‐view” (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free‐breathing, ECG‐triggered, turbo‐spin‐echo black‐blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis.
Materials and Methods
Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field‐of‐view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast‐to‐noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison.
Results
Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4% versus 39 ± 4%). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence.
Conclusion
Zoom imaging allows accurate and time‐efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果