Comments in Academic Articles.

J Skelton - 1988 - ERIC
DOCUMENT RESUME ********************************************************************** Page
1 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 350 831 FL 020 530 AUTHOR Skelton, John TITLE Comments in …

What Authors Want From Journal Reviewers and Editors.

RS Nickerson - 2005 - psycnet.apa.org
Peer review is the primary means of ensuring the maintenance of standards that are
deemed appropriate for scientific publications. There are many similarities, but also some …

Evaluation of manuscripts submitted for publication.

CH Patterson - 1969 - psycnet.apa.org
Abstract Supports Newman's (1966) suggestions for improving evaluation procedures,
focusing on removing the anonymity of reviewers of submitted papers. Identification of …

Commentary: On influential books and journal articles initially rejected because of negative referees' evaluations

JM Campanario - Science communication, 1995 - journals.sagepub.com
This article describes examples of influential and/or highly cited papers that were initially
rejected by one or more scientific journals. The work reported in eight of the papers …

We need research on what constitutes good journal papers—and good editing—not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts!

R Crandall - 1987 - psycnet.apa.org
Comments that M. Boor's (1986) suggestions to improve articles published in professional
journals are unsubstantiated guesses and urges Boor to research his ideas. An example …

Notes on the Reviewing of Learned Books: Good books, had books, scholarly books, popular books, all pose problems for the conscientious reviewer.

G Sarton - science, 1960 - science.org
There are many sides to every ques-tion and as far as the reviewing of books is concerned
there are at least five points of view which are obviously different: the points of view of the …

Have referees rejected some of the most‐cited articles of all times?

JM Campanario - Journal of the American Society for …, 1996 - Wiley Online Library
In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter
when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become …

Some remarks from the outgoing editor.

JP Campbell - 1982 - psycnet.apa.org
Present remarks by the editor as he comes to the end of a six year tenure as editor and two
and half years as associate editor. He takes the opportunity to discuss the organizational …

Reliability of ratings of research papers.

P McReynolds - American Psychologist, 1971 - psycnet.apa.org
Examined interjudge reliability of ratings made by members of a program committee for
research presentations at professional meetings. The committee included 18 prominent …

A bibliometric analysis of the academic influences of and on evaluation theorists' published works

AE Heberger, CA Christie… - American Journal of …, 2010 - journals.sagepub.com
As is the case with other fields, there is motivation for studying the impact that the body of
evaluation theory literature has within and outside the field. The authors used journal articles …