Background: Platform switching for maintaining peri‐implant bone levels has gained
popularity among implant manufacturers over the last few years. However, the assumption …

Aim To systematically review the literature to compare implant survival (IS) and marginal
bone loss (MBL) around platform‐switched (PS) versus conventionally restored platform …

Statement of problem Platform switching using narrower abutments than the implant platform
has been used to reduce marginal bone loss (MBL) surrounding dental implants. While …

Purpose: To assess the methodologic quality of systematic reviews on the effect of platform
switching upon peri-implant marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: An electronic …

Purpose: The aim of this study was to systemically review the effect of platform switching on
preserving implant marginal bone. Materials and Methods: An electronic search (PubMed …

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the
possible benefits of platform-switching (PSW) implants when compared to regular platform …

Objectives To test the null hypothesis of no difference in the implant failure rates, marginal
bone loss (MBL) and postoperative infection in patients who received platform-switched …

Objective: The concept of platform switching has been introduced to implant dentistry based
on observations of reduced peri‐implant bone loss. However, randomized clinical trials are …

Objective To address the focused question, is there an impact of platform switching (PS) on
marginal bone level (MBL) changes around endosseous implants compared to implants with …

Objective The purpose of this ongoing randomized study was to assess differences in bone
level changes and success rates using implants supporting single crowns in the posterior …