We examined public opinion regarding unique aspects of abortion legality to better
understand potential contexts in which stigma may occur and the extent that people (a) …

Americans disagree on legal abortion now about as much as they did in the 1970s, but their
attitudes now sort much more according to political identity. Differences of opinion by …

Objective The aim of this study is to examine how situational abortion attitudes differ when
including additional context related to the gestational age of the pregnancy. Method …

Rationale Policymakers need to know the abortion attitudes of those they represent. In
addition, inaccurate knowledge of or negative attitudes toward abortion may lead to more …

Background Attitudes toward abortion have historically been characterized via dichotomized
labels, yet research suggests that these labels do not appropriately encapsulate beliefs on …

Although media response to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision
was widespread in the United States, the extent to which people were aware of the …

Context Abortion is common in the United States (US), although access is becoming more
difficult for some. In addition to restrictive policies that ban most abortion, limit the number of …

In the United States, legislation intended to limit abortion access based on fetal development
markers (eg, heartbeat, fetal pain) has become increasingly common. We found that …

In polarized societal debates, it is often assumed that perceiving polarization leads
individuals to take sides (eg,“pro‐life” or “pro‐choice”). However, perceiving polarization can …

Abstract Background The Supreme Court of the United States'(SCOTUS) decision in Dobbs
v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned the Court's previous decision in Roe v …