In this paper, I argue that a commitment to a very modest form of egalitarianism—equality
between non-disabled human adults—implies fetal personhood. Since the most plausible …

Calum Miller recently argued that a commitment to a very modest form of egalitarianism—
equality between non-disabled human adults—implies fetal personhood. Miller claims that …

Miller has recently argued that the standard liberal and moderate positions on abortion are
incapable of grounding the claim that 'all non-disabled adult humans are equal'. The reason …

I have recently offered a defence of human equality, and consequently an argument against
abortion. This has been objected to by Bozzo, on the grounds that my account of human …

It is widely thought that abortion on the grounds of fetal abnormality is morally justified. More
controversially, Peter Singer has argued that some infants with severe disabilities ought to …

In a recent article, I argued that all humans are morally equal, and that this generates an
argument against abortion. Here, I defend my argument against two objections from …

This paper argues that the central issue in the abortion debate has not changed since 1967
when the English parliament enacted the Abortion Act. That central issue concerns the moral …

This article seeks to explore utilitarian conceptions of personhood which for a long time have
been employed as part of a rational moral justification for the termination of pregnancy …

Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral
status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant …

In an article of this journal, Perry Hendricks makes a novel argument for the immorality of
abortion. According to his impairment argument, abortion is immoral because:(a) it is wrong …