Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this study was to compare the functional
outcomes after pessary treatment and after prolapse surgery as primary treatments for pelvic …

Objective To compare the 24‐month efficacy of pessary or surgery as the primary treatment
for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Design Multicentre prospective comparative …

Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the
effectiveness of pessaries and surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse …

Objective To investigate which specific clinical factors influence patients' choice of prolapse
treatment. Methods This study includes a total of 510 cases with symptomatic pelvic organ …

Introduction The primary objective of this study was to investigate the percentages of women
choosing watchful waiting, pessary use or surgery as first-line treatment of pelvic organ …

Background Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is quite common and has an impact on quality of
life (QoL). The evaluation of QoL after treatment for prolapse is important. The objective was …

Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this study was creating a prediction model for
continued pessary use in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and …

Abstract Background/Aims: To assess whether patients prefer surgery or a pessary as
treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A structured interview was performed …

Introduction and hypothesis There is little data in the literature regarding the feasibility and
limitations of pessary therapy after pelvic reconstructive surgery for symptom recurrence for …

OBJECTIVE: To compare pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, and complications in women
with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with or without vaginal pessaries in addition …