Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But
even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers …

This article tackles a new challenging task in computational argumentation. Given a pair of
two arguments to a certain controversial topic, we aim to directly assess qualitative …

Fallacies are arguments that employ faulty reasoning. Given their persuasive and seemingly
valid nature, fallacious arguments are often used in political debates. Employing these …

People debate on a variety of topics on online platforms such as Reddit, or Facebook.
Debates can be lengthy, with users exchanging a wealth of information and opinions …

Text generation has received a lot of attention in computational argumentation research as
of recently. A particularly challenging task is the generation of counter-arguments. So far …

Fallacies play a prominent role in argumentation since antiquity due to their contribution to
argumentation in critical thinking education. Their role is even more crucial nowadays as …

High quality arguments are essential elements for human reasoning and decision-making
processes. However, effective argument construction is a challenging task for both human …

Assessing the quality of arguments and of the claims the arguments are composed of has
become a key task in computational argumentation. However, even if different claims share …

In real-world debates, the most common way to counter an argument is to reason against its
main point, that is, its conclusion. Existing work on the automatic generation of natural …

We present a neural architecture for modeling argumentative dialogue that explicitly models
the interplay between an Opinion Holder's (OH's) reasoning and a challenger's argument …