Late chronic infection is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is
often treated with surgery. The one-stage surgical procedure is believed to be the more …

Background and purpose There has been a limited amount of research on risk factors for
revision due to infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA), probably due to low absolute …

Background Two-stage revision is regarded by many as the best treatment of chronic
infection in hip arthroplasties. Some international reports, however, have advocated one …

Background and purpose—Focus on prevention, surveillance, and treatment of infection
after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the last decade has resulted in new knowledge and …

Background The best approach for surgical treatment of an infected THA remains
controversial. Two-stage revision is believed to result in lower reinfection rates but may …

Background and purpose Controversies still exist regarding the best surgical procedure in
the treatment of periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Based on data in …

Background and purpose The risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip
arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be increasing in Norway. We investigated whether …

Introduction Two-stage revision is the current gold standard treatment for infected total hip
arthroplasties (THA) with good clinical outcomes. Single-stage revision THA offers the …

Background and purpose Periprosthetic infection of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is
commonly treated with a two-stage revision procedure. After resection of the infected THA …

INTRODUCTION: Better outcomes have been reported for two-stage total hip arthroplasty
(THA) revision for infection. However, one-stage revision arthroplasty remains an attractive …