Thirty years later: what has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced?

RA Hopper, RE Ettinger, CA Purnell… - Plastic and …, 2020 - journals.lww.com
Over the past 30 years, distraction forces have been applied to the spectrum of craniofacial
osteotomies. It is now time to assess critically the current understanding of distraction in …

Guideline for care of patients with the diagnoses of craniosynostosis: working group on craniosynostosis

IMJ Mathijssen - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2015 - journals.lww.com
This guideline for care of children with craniosynostosis was developed by a national
working group with representatives of 11 matrix societies of specialties and the national …

Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature

E Nout, LLM Cesteleyn, KGH van der Wal… - International journal of …, 2008 - Elsevier
Since its introduction in about 1950, the Le Fort III (LF III) procedure has become a widely
accepted treatment for correction of midface hypoplasia and related functional and esthetic …

Long-term functional outcome in 167 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis; defining a syndrome-specific risk profile

T de Jong, N Bannink, HH Bredero-Boelhouwer… - Journal of plastic …, 2010 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the long-term prevalence of elevated intracranial pressure
(ICP), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), level of education, language and motor skills …

Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort III osteotomy in correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia: a systematic review

H Saltaji, M Altalibi, MP Major, MH Al-Nuaimi… - Journal of Oral and …, 2014 - Elsevier
Purpose It has been debated whether the Le Fort III procedure using distraction
osteogenesis (LFIII-DO) reduces the risk of postintervention relapse compared with …

Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

SL Austin, CR Mattick… - … & Craniofacial Research, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
Structured Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis to
orthognathic surgery for the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in individuals with cleft lip and …

An update on midface advancement using Le Fort II and III distraction osteogenesis

Y Tahiri, J Taylor - Seminars in plastic surgery, 2014 - thieme-connect.com
Le Fort II and III distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a powerful tool in the craniofacial
armamentarium that is most often employed to treat patients with craniofacial syndromes …

Retrospective review of the complication profile associated with 71 subcranial and transcranial midface distraction procedures at a single institution

RS Zhang, LO Lin, IC Hoppe… - Plastic and …, 2019 - journals.lww.com
Background: This study characterizes the perioperative morbidity of a large cohort of
subjects with syndromic craniosynostosis who underwent transcranial or subcranial midface …

Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices

TR Meling, HE Høgevold, BJ Due-Tønnessen… - International journal of …, 2011 - Elsevier
This study compares internal and external distraction devices in the treatment of midface
retrusion. 20 patients were treated with midface distraction (12 Crouzon, 4 Apert, 4 others); …

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report

XX Wang, X Wang, ZL Li, B Yi, C Liang, YL Jia… - International journal of …, 2009 - Elsevier
To evaluate the feasibility of anterior maxillary segmental distraction (AMSD) to correct
maxillary hypoplasia and severe dental crowding in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients, 7 …