This article reviews neuroethics issues that arise with the development, translation, and use
of technologies for neuromodulation. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and …

Advances in new neuroscientific research tools and technologies have not only led to new
insight into the processes of the human brain, they have also refined and provided …

A considerable body of evidence now documents, beyond reasonable doubt, biological and
health risk factors for crime and violence. Nevertheless, intervention and prevention efforts …

How should we punish criminal offenders? One prima facie attractive punishment is
administering a mandatory neurointervention—“interventions that exert a physical, chemical …

Advances in psychiatric research and clinical psychiatry in the last 30 years have given rise
to a host of new questions that lie at the intersection of psychiatry, neuroscience, philosophy …

The possibility of neurotechnological interference with our brain and mind raises questions
about the moral rights that would protect against the (mis) use of these technologies. One …

Neurobiological and behavioural genetic research gives rise to speculations about potential
biomedical interventions to prevent, contain, or treat violent and antisocial behaviour. These …

In this paper, I discuss whether it is ever morally permissible to diminish the cognitive
abilities or capacities of some cognitively gifted offenders whose ability to commit their …

A wide variety of medications and neuromodulation techniques are being investigated to
manage risk factors for deviant behavior. If certain neurointerventions can restore impaired …

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, I defend and expand the Fortificationist Theory of
Punishment (FTP). Second, I argue that this theory implies that non-consensual …