What we believe and what we do not believe has a great impact on what we do and fail to
do. Hence, if we want to act responsibly, we should believe responsibly. However, do we …

Sanford C. Goldberg argues in this volume that epistemic normativity-the sort of normativity
implicated in assessments of whether a belief amounts to knowledge-is grounded in the …

The question of whether it is ever permissible to believe on insufficient evidence has once
again become a live question. Greater attention is now being paid to practical dimensions of …

Ответственность субъекта речемыслительной деятельности за порождаемые речевые
произведения вызывает в настоящее время повышенный интерес исследователей. С …

I investigate what we mean when we hold people responsible for beliefs. I begin by outlining
a puzzle concerning our ordinary judgments about beliefs and briefly survey and critique …

Predatory grooming is, broadly speaking, a preparatory process through which target
individuals are primed, coached, or generally readied in some sense, for conduct that is …

Эпистемологические основания разграничения факта и мнения при определении
степени эпистемической ответственности – тема научной статьи по языкознанию и …

The article deals with the analysis of epistemic responsibility in the context of media
language from the epistemological, linguojuridical, and linguistic points of view and reveals …

There are mental actions, and a number of epistemic attitudes involve activity. But can there
be epistemic agency? I argue that there is a limit to any claim that we can be epistemic …

К ПРОБЛЕМЕ ЭПИСТЕМИЧЕСКОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В ЯЗЫКЕ ЖУРНАЛИСТИКИ
КОРЗИНА ПОИСК НАВИГАТОР СЕССИЯ КОНТАКТЫ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ПУБЛИКАЦИИ …