Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment

HJ De Clerck, WR Proffit - American Journal of Orthodontics and …, 2015 - Elsevier
A summary of the current status of modification of jaw growth indicates the following. 1.
Transverse expansion of the maxilla is easy before adolescence, requires heavy forces to …

Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics

P Ngan, W Moon - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial …, 2015 - Elsevier
Highlights•We studied the best timing to intercept a developing Class III malocclusion.•
Camouflage is possible with microimplants for skeletal anchorage.•Improvements in …

Treatment options for class III malocclusion in growing patients with emphasis on maxillary protraction

Z Azamian, F Shirban - Scientifica, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
It is very difficult to diagnose and treat Class III malocclusion. This type of malocclusion
involves a number of cranial base and maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental …

Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography

E Yildirim, S Karacay, M Erkan - The Angle Orthodontist, 2014 - meridian.allenpress.com
Objective: To evaluate the condylar changes through cone-beam computed tomography
(CBCT) images in patients treated with Twin-Block functional appliance. Materials and …

Class III treatment with skeletal and dental anchorage: a review of comparative effects

R Clemente, L Contardo, C Greco… - BioMed research …, 2018 - Wiley Online Library
Objectives. This review addresses the comparative effects of skeletal anchored maxillary
protraction (MP) versus dental anchored MP. Materials and Methods. The studies retrieved …

Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis

MA Cornelis, M Tepedino, NV Riis, X Niu… - European Journal of …, 2021 - academic.oup.com
Objective The aim of this systematic review was to determine which evidence level supports
maxillary advancement after bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in growing …

Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols

MH Elnagar, E Elshourbagy, S Ghobashy… - American Journal of …, 2016 - Elsevier
Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of 2 protocols of
bone-anchored maxillary protraction with an untreated control group. Methods Thirty …

Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial

RA de Souza, J Rino Neto, JB de Paiva - Progress in orthodontics, 2019 - Springer
Background The use of skeletal anchorage devices for maxillary protraction in patients with
class III malocclusion due to deficiency in the middle third of the face has been shown to be …

Effects of maxillary protraction appliances on airway dimensions in growing class III maxillary retrognathic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Y Ming, Y Hu, Y Li, J Yu, H He, L Zheng - International journal of pediatric …, 2018 - Elsevier
Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess, through a systematic review and meta-
analysis, the efficacy of maxillary protraction appliances (MPAs) on improving pharyngeal …

Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion

Y Ren, R Steegman, A Dieters, J Jansma… - Clinical Oral …, 2019 - Springer
Objective This prospective controlled study evaluated the effect of bone-anchored maxillary
protraction therapy in cleft children with Class III malocclusion using CBCT-derived 3D …