This article develops and defends the Wittgensteinian idea of basic moral certainty that I
advanced in earlier writings. It seeks to defend the core of this idea against criticisms issued …

Este artículo de reflexión presenta teóricamente las comprensiones del desarrollo moral
estructuralista, pluralista y del instinto moral, con base en los criterios de indagación fáctica …

Pleasants argues in favour of the idea of basic moral certainties. Analogous to Wittgenstein's
basic empirical certainties, basic moral certainties are universal certainties that cannot be …

In this report we assess the state of the matter of the governance and the role of media in the
case of Italian democracy based on deliberative communication. We explain how legal and …

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Franklin G Miller recently argued that the wrongness of killing
is best explained by the harm that comes to the victim, and that 'total disability'best explains …

Este artículo de reflexión presenta teóricamente las comprensiones del desarrollo moral
estructuralista, pluralista y del instinto moral, con base en los criterios de indagación fáctica …

All animals with non-borderline sentience are deserving of certain legal considerations
independent of their use and relationship to human beings. That is, all sentient beings …

We are very grateful to the commentators for taking the time to respond to our little
article,'What Makes Killing Wrong?'They raise many points, so we cannot respond to them …

Abstract In 'What Makes Killing Wrong?'Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller make the bold claim
that killing in itself is not wrong, what is wrong is totally-disabling. In 'After-Birth Abortion …