Objective: In June 2022, the US Supreme Court removed federal abortion protections, giving
individual states the authority to enact abortion regulations. Since that ruling, many states …

In the present study, we examined relations among reactions to the Dobbs v. Jackson court
ruling (heretofore adverse reactions), psychological distress, collective action, and abortion …

The sustainable development (SD) policy is also a family-friendly policy. Its crucial element
is the use of social transfers (STs) as cash benefits for children. This study aims to explain …

This paper argues that abortion access is an important subject for bioethics scholarship and
reflects on the relationship between legal frameworks and access to care. The author uses …

On 24 July 2022, the landmark decision Roe v. Wade (1973), that secured a right to abortion
for decades, was overruled by the US Supreme Court. The Court decision in Dobbs v …

This statement summarizes key findings from anthropological and related scholarship on the
harmful consequences of inadequate abortion access, leading the Society for Medical …

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overturned two previous
rulings that had affirmed the constitutional right to abortion prior to fetal viability. While …

This book introduces readers to the many arguments and controversies concerning abortion.
While it argues for ethical and legal positions on the issues, it focuses on how to think about …

In “The Ethics of Access: Reframing the Need for Abortion Care as a Health Disparity,”
Watson (2022) considers the advantages of framing the need for abortion as an issue of …

Katie Watson describes her article in this special issue as “a call to bioethicists to recognize
the ways we may have undervalued the moral status of women in our analytic frameworks …