[HTML][HTML] Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

C Garritty, G Gartlehner, B Nussbaumer-Streit… - Journal of clinical …, 2021 - Elsevier
Objectives To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs)
produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence …

Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester

M Bond, S Bedenlier, VI Marín, M Händel - International Journal of …, 2021 - Springer
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic that spread globally in 2020, higher education courses were
subsequently offered in fully remote, online formats. A plethora of primary studies began …

Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review

M Bond - Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2021 - discovery.ucl.ac.uk
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has had an unprecedented impact on education around
the world. In order to understand and face this challenge, educators and researchers …

Impact of COVID-19 on people with physical disabilities: a rapid review

A Lebrasseur, N Fortin-Bédard, J Lettre… - Disability and health …, 2021 - Elsevier
Background The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic changes in the lives of the general
population. People with physical disabilities, who commonly encounter daily challenges …

Machine learning on small size samples: A synthetic knowledge synthesis

P Kokol, M Kokol, S Zagoranski - Science Progress, 2022 - journals.sagepub.com
Machine Learning is an increasingly important technology dealing with the growing
complexity of the digitalised world. Despite the fact, that we live in a 'Big data'world where …

Rapid reviews: the pros and cons of an accelerated review process

P Moons, E Goossens… - European Journal of …, 2021 - academic.oup.com
Although systematic reviews are the method of choice to synthesize scientific evidence, they
can take years to complete and publish. Clinicians, managers, and policy-makers often need …

Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group

D Pollock, L Alexander, Z Munn, MDJ Peters… - JBI evidence …, 2022 - journals.lww.com
Abstract Knowledge user consultation is often limited or omitted in the conduct of scoping
reviews. Not including knowledge users within the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews …

[HTML][HTML] Weekly updates of national living evidence-based guidelines: methods for the Australian living guidelines for care of people with COVID-19

B Tendal, JP Vogel, S McDonald, S Norris… - Journal of clinical …, 2021 - Elsevier
Abstract Background and Objectives The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence
Taskforce is a consortium of 31 Australian health professional organisations developing …

Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation …

T Lotfi, A Stevens, EA Akl, M Falavigna, T Kredo… - Journal of Clinical …, 2021 - Elsevier
Published research on COVID-19 is increasing rapidly and integrated in guidelines. The
trustworthiness of guidelines can vary depending on the methods used to assemble and …

The importance of social media users' responses in tackling digital COVID-19 misinformation in Africa

R Stewart, A Madonsela, N Tshabalala, L Etale… - Digital …, 2022 - journals.sagepub.com
Objective Digital technologies present both an opportunity and a threat for advancing public
health. At a time of pandemic, social media has become a tool for the rapid spread of …