Understanding the role of testimony in children's moral development: Theories, controversies, and implications

PH Li, MA Koenig - Developmental Review, 2023 - Elsevier
Children, much like adults, rely heavily on information from other people in the domains of
word learning, science and religion (Harris, Koenig, Corriveau & Jaswal, 2018). However …

Why think for yourself?

J Matheson - Episteme, 2024 - cambridge.org
In this paper, I explore an underappreciated tension between two epistemic values:
epistemic autonomy and the love of truth. On the one hand, it seems as though any healthy …

Standpoint epistemology and epistemic peerhood: A defense of epistemic privilege

B Toole - Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2023 - cambridge.org
Standpoint epistemology is committed to the view that some epistemic advantage can be
drawn from the position of powerlessness. Call this the epistemic privilege thesis. This thesis …

[HTML][HTML] Artificial moral experts: asking for ethical advice to artificial intelligent assistants

B Rodríguez-López, J Rueda - AI and Ethics, 2023 - Springer
In most domains of human life, we are willing to accept that there are experts with greater
knowledge and competencies that distinguish them from non-experts or laypeople. Despite …

Why You Ought to Defer:: Moral Deference and Marginalized Experience

S Pearlman, E Williams - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 2022 - ojs.lib.uwo.ca
In this paper we argue that moral deference is prima facie obligatory in cases in which the
testifier is a member of a marginalized social group that the receiver is not and testifies about …

Attentional moral perception

J Vance, PJ Werner - Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2022 - brill.com
Moral perceptualism is the view that perceptual experience is attuned to pick up on moral
features in our environment, just as it is attuned to pick up on mundane features of an …

Collateral conflicts and epistemic norms

JA Carter - Epistemic Dilemmas, 2021 - taylorfrancis.com
This paper focuses on a specific kind of (epistemic) normative conflict, collateral normative
conflict—viz., where cognition's working badly at the global level of general dispositions to …

The Argument from Common Consent

J Matheson - Contemporary Arguments in Natural Theology: God …, 2021 - torrossa.com
In this chapter, I will explain the common consent argument for theism, and its motivation.
According to the common consent argument it is rational for you to believe that God exists …

[引用][C] Expertise: A philosophical introduction

JC Watson - 2020 - Bloomsbury Publishing

[图书][B] Why You Ought to Defer: Moral Deference and Marginalized Identity

SL Pearlman - 2023 - search.proquest.com
In this dissertation I argue that non-group members have both an epistemic and moral duty
to defer to marginalized testifiers when they testify about the identity-based harms that they …