Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM Gardner, DL Brown - Personality and individual differences, 2010 - Elsevier
Figural drawing scales are commonly used to measure aspects of body image disturbance.
There are several advantages to figural drawing scales including ease and flexibility in …
被引用次数：349 相关文章

Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales.

RM Gardner, DL Brown - Personality and Individual Differences, 2010 - psycnet.apa.org
Figural drawing scales are commonly used to measure aspects of body image disturbance.
There are several advantages to figural drawing scales including ease and flexibility in …

Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM Gardner, DL Brown - Personality and Individual Differences, 2010 - infona.pl
Figural drawing scales are commonly used to measure aspects of body image disturbance.
There are several advantages to figural drawing scales including ease and flexibility in …

[引用][C] Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM Gardner, DL Brown - Personality and Individual Differences, 2010 - cir.nii.ac.jp
Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales | CiNii Research CiNii 国立情報学
研究所 学術情報ナビゲータ[サイニィ] 詳細へ移動 検索フォームへ移動 論文・データをさがす 大学 …

[引用][C] Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM GARDNER, DL BROWN - Personality and individual …, 2010 - pascal-francis.inist.fr
Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales CNRS Inist Pascal-Francis CNRS
Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases Simple search Advanced search Search by …
[PDF] researchgate.net

[PDF][PDF] Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM Gardner, DL Brown - Personality and Individual Differences, 2010 - researchgate.net
Figural drawing scales are commoniy used to measure aspects of body image disturbance.
There are several advantages to figural drawing scales including ease and flexibility in …

[引用][C] Body image assessment: A review of figural drawing scales

RM GARDNER, DL BROWN - Personality and individual differences, 2010 - Elsevier