Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gómez-García, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - Journal of Clinical …, 2017 - Elsevier
Objectives No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …
被引用次数：30 相关文章
[PDF] researchgate.net

[PDF][PDF] Most sytematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gomez-Garcia, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - researchgate.net
2. Brown G, Wang E, Leon A, Huynh M, Wehner M, Matro R, Linos E, Liao W, Haemel A.
Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor-induced psoriasis: Systematic review of clinical features …

Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gómez-García, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - Journal of Clinical …, 2017 - jclinepi.com
Objectives No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …

Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gómez-García, J Ruano… - Journal of clinical …, 2017 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Objectives No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …

Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.

F Gómez-García, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - Journal of Clinical …, 2017 - europepmc.org
Objectives No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …
[PDF] core.ac.uk

[PDF][PDF] Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias us-ing ROBIS tool

F Gomez-Garcia, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - Francisco José Gómez … - core.ac.uk
Objectives: No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodolofical Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …

Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gómez-García, J Ruano… - Journal of Clinical …, 2017 - search.proquest.com
Objectives No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …
[PDF] uco.es

[PDF][PDF] Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias us-ing ROBIS tool

F Gomez-Garcia, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - Francisco José Gómez … - helvia.uco.es
Objectives: No gold standard exists to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews
(SRs). Although Assessing the Methodolofical Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is …

Most sytematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool

F Gomez-Garcia, J Ruano, J Gay-Mimbrera… - jclinepi.com
2. Brown G, Wang E, Leon A, Huynh M, Wehner M, Matro R, Linos E, Liao W, Haemel A.
Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor-induced psoriasis: Systematic review of clinical features …