Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics
R Lowry, M Peterson - Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2012 - journals.sagepub.com
Cost-benefit analysis is commonly understood to be intimately connected with utilitarianism
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics
R Lowry, M Peterson - Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2012 - econpapers.repec.org
Cost-benefit analysis is commonly understood to be intimately connected with utilitarianism
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics
RJ Lowry, MB Peterson - Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2012 - research.tue.nl
Cost-benefit analysis is commonly understood to be intimately connected with utilitarianism
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics
R Lowry, M Peterson - Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2012 - philpapers.org
Cost-benefit analysis is commonly understood to be intimately connected with utilitarianism
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics
R Lowry, M Peterson - Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2012 - ideas.repec.org
Cost-benefit analysis is commonly understood to be intimately connected with utilitarianism
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …
and incompatible with other moral theories, particularly those that focus on deontological …