However, the statistical analysis underlying Kanazawa's claims has been shown to have
basic flaws, with some of his analyses making the er ror of controlling for an intermediate …

Kanazawa's findings are not statistically significant, and the patterns he analyzed could well
have occurred by chance.[...] the observed proportion of heads is 40 percent but with a …

How do we interpret findings that are intriguing, potentially important, but not statistically
significant? We discuss in the context of a series of papers in the Journal of Theoretical …

How do we interpret findings that are intriguing, potentially important, but not statistically
significant? We discuss in the context of a series of papers in the Journal of Theoretical …

How do we interpret findings that are intriguing, potentially important, but not statistically
significant? We discuss in the context of a series of papers in the Journal of Theoretical …

However, the statistical analysis underlying Kanazawa's claims has been shown to have
basic flaws, with some of his analyses making the error of controlling for an intermediate …

How do we interpret findings that are intriguing, potentially important, but not statistically
significant? We discuss in the context of a series of papers in the Journal of Theoretical …

2009 July–August 311 www. americanscientist. org© 2009 Sigma Xi, The Scientific
Research Society. Reproduction with permission only. Contact perms@ amsci. org. parents …