One recent trend in contemporary epistemology is to study the way in which the concept of
knowledge is actually applied in everyday settings. This approach has inspired an exciting …

Orthodoxy in the contemporary debate on knowledge ascriptions holds that the truth‐value
of knowledge ascriptions is purely a matter of truth‐relevant factors. One familiar challenge …

Justification has long been considered a necessary condition for knowledge, and theories
that deny the necessity of justification have been dismissed as nonstarters. In this chapter …

Reductive intellectualists about knowledge-how (eg, Stanley & Williamson Journal of
Philosophy 98, 411–44, 2001; Stanley Noûs 45, 207–38, 2011a, 2011b; Brogaard …

Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in the semantics of knowledge-attributing
sentences, not just among epistemologists but among philosophers of language seeking a …

In this book, Michael Blome-Tillmann offers a critical overview of the current debate on the
semantics of knowledge attributions. The book is divided into five parts. Part 1 introduces the …

Four experiments investigate the folk concept of “understanding,” in particular when and why
it is deployed differently from the concept of knowledge. We argue for the positions that (1) …

If epistemic contextualism is correct, then knowledge attributions do not have stable truth‐
conditions across different contexts. John Hawthorne, Timothy Williamson, and Patrick …

Knowledge ascriptions, such as' Sam knows that Obama is president of the United States',
play a central role in our cognitive and social lives. For example, they are closely related to …

This chapter argues that intuitions about particular instances of knowledge are generally a
reliable guide to the nature of knowledge itself. We argue that there is antecedent reason to …