Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are
an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit …

Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to evidence synthesis with a
growing suite of methodological guidance and resources to assist review authors with their …

Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance
for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and …

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and report on evidence (such as
guidance) or tools regarding methodological quality or risk of bias of scoping reviews …

The introduction should be comprehensive and cover all the main elements of the topic
under review. Due to scoping reviews being essentially exploratory, it is not expected that …

Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and
currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic …

Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of
scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the …

Background The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for
synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study …

Background Scoping reviews are used to identify knowledge gaps, set research agendas,
and identify implications for decision-making. The conduct and reporting of scoping reviews …

Background: In 2014, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
published a comprehensive methodology for the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews …