The virtues and vices of argument are now an established part of argumentation theory.
They have helped direct attention to hitherto neglected aspects of how we argue. However, it …

Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged
inability to account for argument cogency in virtue-theoretical terms. Instead of defending …

In this paper, I argue that, despite the progress made in recent years, virtue argumentation
theory still lacks a more systematic acknowledgment of other-regarding virtues. A fuller …

In this paper we consider the prospects for an account of good argument that takes the
character of the arguer into consideration. We conclude that although there is much to be …

Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of
an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of …

A virtue approach to argumentation would focus on the arguers' character rather than the
arguments. Therefore, it must be explained how good arguments relate to virtuous arguers …

Virtuous arguers are expected to manifest virtues such as intellectual humility and open-
mindedness, but from such traits the quality of arguments does not immediately follow …

Abstract Argumentation theorists are beginning to think of ad hominem arguments as
generally legitimate. Virtue argumentation theorists argue that a character trait approach to …

Abstract Argumentation virtue theory is a new field in argumentation studies. As in the case
of virtue ethics and virtue epistemology, the study of virtue argumentation draws its …

The incompleteness problem for virtue ethics is inherited by a virtue-based theory of
argumentation as developed by Daniel Cohen (2007). A complete normative theory of …