Defining standard of practice: pros and cons of the usual care arm

F Angriman, MH Masse… - Current Opinion in Critical …, 2019 - journals.lww.com
Usual care control arms may enhance generalizability while introducing significant
limitations. Potential solutions include the use of pretrial surveys to evaluate the extent to …

The science of implementation: changing the practice of critical care

CR Weinert, HJ Mann - Current opinion in critical care, 2008 - journals.lww.com
Changing clinical practice is sometimes as difficult as the basic science and clinical trials
work that led to the discovery of beneficial therapies. Investigators are now beginning to …

Science of improvement versus science of implementation: integrating both into clinical inquiry

BB Granger - AACN Advanced Critical Care, 2018 - AACN
The conceptual framework that guides improvement science as a unique discipline was
born in the automobile industry9 and has gained momentum in health care as a result of the …

Reducing variation and standardizing practice in the intensive care unit

KA Wood, DC Angus - Current opinion in critical care, 2001 - journals.lww.com
In this issue, the section on outcomes research in critical care focuses on the three
interrelated topics:(1) practice variation,(2) the relationship between practice variation and …

How well do critical care audit and feedback interventions adhere to best practice? Development and application of the REFLECT-52 evaluation tool

M Foster, J Presseau, E Podolsky, L McIntyre… - Implementation …, 2021 - Springer
Abstract Background Healthcare Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions have been shown
to be an effective means of changing healthcare professional behavior, but work is required …

Bringing implementation science to the intensive care unit

JM Kahn - Current opinion in critical care, 2017 - journals.lww.com
A depressing truism of modern healthcare is that clinicians routinely fail deliver evidence-
based treatments proven to save lives [1]. In the ICU, a growing body of literature …

[HTML][HTML] Comparative effectiveness research in critically ill patients: risks associated with mischaracterising usual care

WN Applefeld, J Wang, HG Klein, RL Danner… - Critical Care and …, 2020 - Elsevier
Comparative effectiveness research can help guide the use of common, routine medical
practices. However, to be safe and informative, such trials must include at least one …

Standardized intensive care. Protocol misalignment and impact misattribution

BP Kavanagh, M Nurok - … Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care …, 2016 - atsjournals.org
Guidelines, protocols, and checklists (together called “protocols”) can be immensely helpful
in the clinical arena. However, clinicians and health care systems relying on protocols must …

Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions

BT Thompson, D Schoenfeld - Proceedings of the American …, 2007 - atsjournals.org
We discuss the pros and cons of including usual care as a control arm in clinical trials of
nonpharmacologic interventions. Usual care is a term used to describe the full spectrum of …

[引用][C] Evidence-based practice changes: Measuring the outcome

A Gawlinski - AACN Advanced Critical Care, 2007 - AACN
One question that often arises when making evidence-based practice (EBP) changes is
what outcomes should be measured to determine whether an innovation results in improved …