Abstract [Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 145 (7) of
Psychological Bulletin (see record 2019-32510-001). In the article, the Open Science …

A recent study of the replicability of key psychological findings is a major contribution toward
understanding the human side of the scientific process. Despite the careful and nuanced …

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for
innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practiced or …

Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However,
contrary to the commonly held view, we show that in the current (selective) publication …

Psychology advances knowledge by testing statistical hypotheses using empirical
observations and data. The expectation is that most statistically significant findings can be …

INTRODUCTION Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it
characterizes current research is unknown. Scientific claims should not gain credence …

Recent controversies in psychology have spurred conversations about the nature and
quality of psychological research. One topic receiving substantial attention is the role of …

Failures to replicate published psychological research findings have contributed to a “crisis
of confidence.” Several reasons for these failures have been proposed, the most notable …

There have been frequent expressions of concern over the supposed failure of researchers
to conduct replication studies. But the large number of meta-analyses in our literatures …

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings,
with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes …