How is AMSTAR applied by authors–a call for better reporting

D Pieper, N Koensgen, J Breuing, L Ge… - BMC medical research …, 2018 - Springer
Background The assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) tool is widely used
for investigating the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SR). Originally, AMSTAR …

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?

U Wegewitz, B Weikert, A Fishta, A Jacobs… - BMC Medical Research …, 2016 - Springer
Background Evidence syntheses, and in particular systematic reviews (SRs), have become
one of the cornerstones of evidence-based health care. The Assessment of Multiple …

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor

CM Faggion - BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2015 - Springer
Background Systematic reviews are pivotal components in the development of evidence-
based clinical guidelines. To evaluate the methodological quality of these systematic …

[HTML][HTML] Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study

C Lu, T Lu, L Ge, N Yang, P Yan… - Annals of Translational …, 2020 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses (MAs) are widely used
in resolving questions in various healthcare areas (such as, traditional Chinese medicine …

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

BJ Shea, JM Grimshaw, GA Wells, M Boers… - BMC medical research …, 2007 - Springer
Background Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological
quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert …

Authors should clearly report how they derived the overall rating when applying AMSTAR 2—a cross-sectional study

D Pieper, RC Lorenz, T Rombey, A Jacobs… - Journal of clinical …, 2021 - Elsevier
Objectives A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (SRs) 2 (AMSTAR 2) allows for
deriving the overall confidence in an SR. We investigated how authors derived the overall …

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study

A Gates, M Gates, G Duarte, M Cary, M Becker… - Systematic reviews, 2018 - Springer
Abstract Background Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can
provide the best evidence to inform decision-making, but their methodological and reporting …

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2

R Perry, A Whitmarsh, V Leach, P Davies - Systematic Reviews, 2021 - Springer
Abstract Background AMSTAR-2 is a 16-item assessment tool to check the quality of a
systematic review and establish whether the most important elements are reported. ROBIS is …

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

M Pollock, RM Fernandes, L Hartling - BMC Medical Research …, 2017 - Springer
Background Overviews of reviews (overviews) compile information from multiple systematic
reviews (SRs) to provide a single synthesis of relevant evidence for decision-making. It is …

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?

D Pieper, T Mathes, M Eikermann - BMC research notes, 2014 - Springer
Background There is a lack of an instrument to evaluate systematic reviews of non-
randomized studies in epidemiological research. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic …