When risky technologies are debated in the media or when cases of scientific misconduct
are made public, inevitable discussions arise about public loss of trust in science. However …

Scientists (and science as a whole) provide evidence and advice for societal problem
solving and collective decision-making. For this advice to be heard, the public must be …

Trust in science is, to a considerable extent, the outcome of communication. News and
online media in particular are important mediators of trust in science. So far, however …

Current discussions on public trust, as well as on risk communication, have a restricted
rationalistic bias in which the cognitive-reflexive aspect of trust is emphasized at the …

This article analyzes three publicly available datasets focused on trust in science and
scientists. It specifically seeks to understand what direct measures of trust (ie questions that …

Trust is a central concept in the philosophy of science. We highlight how trust is important in
the wide variety of interactions between science and society. We claim that examining and …

Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both
trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of …

Who individuals trust for information on highly technical or scientific issues is an important
issue in contemporary risk society in which social change and technological developments …

Given that trust plays a key role in the communication of scientific information about the
environment to the public, this study examines what explains trust in specific sources of such …

In this paper I use philosophical accounts on the relationship between trust and knowledge
in science to apprehend this relationship on the Web. I argue that trust and knowledge are …