Opinions about cognitive enhancement (CE) are context-dependent. Prior research has
demonstrated that factors like peer pressure, the influence of authority figures, competition …

People vary widely in their acceptance of the use of pharmacological cognitive
enhancement (CE). We tested the hypothesis that the acceptability of CE is malleable, by …

In “Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies across Different Situations,” Dinh et
al.(2020) study indicates that opinions about use of pharmacological cognitive enhancement …

Empirical investigations into ordinary people's bioethical intuitions have steadily grown
throughout the last decades. A new study by Dinh, Humphries, and Chatterjee (2020) …

In their article “Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies Across Different
Situations,” Dinh et al.(2020) gave credence to the hypothesis that opinions about cognitive …

The debate over the propriety of cognitive enhancement evokes both enthusiasm and worry.
To gain further insight into the reasons that people may have for endorsing or eschewing …

Interventions aiming to enhance cognitive functions (eg, computerized cognitive training and
non-invasive brain stimulation) are increasingly widespread for the treatment and prevention …

Stimulant drugs, transcranial magnetic stimulation, brain-computer interfaces, and even
genetic modifications are all discussed as forms of potential cognitive enhancement …

A primary means for the augmentation of cognitive brain functions is “pharmacological
cognitive enhancement”(PCE). The term usually refers to the off-label use of medical …

The phenomenon of cognitive enhancement is attracting attention in bioethics literature and
beyond, in public policy. In response, three bodies—the British Medical Association (BMA); …