Hoerl & McCormack argue that children are incapable of reasoning about time until age 5.
However, their dual timing perspective does not address non-symbolic timing, or timing in …

Here I consider the possible role of the temporal updating system in the development of the
temporal reasoning system. Using evidence from children's acquisition of time words, I …

Evidence from our research on young children's temporal understanding supports Hoerl &
McCormack's view that young children rely on a temporal updating system to change …

We outline a dual systems approach to temporal cognition, which distinguishes between two
cognitive systems for dealing with how things unfold over time–a temporal updating system …

We focus on three main sets of topics emerging from the commentaries on our target article.
First, we discuss several types of animal behavior that commentators cite as evidence …

This commentary construes the relation between the two systems of temporal updating and
temporal reasoning as a bifurcation and tracks it across three time scales: phylogeny …

Hoerl and McCormack argue that comparative and developmental psychology teaches us
that neither animals nor infants can think and reason about time. We argue that the authors …

Abstract This commentary relates Hoerl & McCormack's dual systems perspective to models
of cognitive development emphasizing representational redescription and the role of …

Abstract Contrary to Hoerl & McCormack (H&M), we argue that the best account of temporal
cognition in humans is one in which a single system becomes capable of representing time …

The target article focuses on the predictive coding of" what" and" where" something
happened and the" where" and" what" response to make. We extend that scope by …