Purpose The international multicentre FAME Study (n= 1,005) demonstrated significant
health benefits for patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) …

Background—The Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
(FAME) study demonstrated significantly improved health outcomes at 1 year in patients …

BACKGROUND: Although its limitations for diagnosing critical coronary artery disease are
well described, coronary angiography remains the predominant method for guiding …

Summary Background In the Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel
Evaluation (FAME) study, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary …

Background: Previous studies found that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not
improve outcome compared with medical therapy (MT) in patients with stable coronary artery …

Background Guidelines recommend coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery over
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of 3-vessel coronary artery …

Background There are limited data regarding comparative prognosis and medical cost
between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–based and angiography-based percutaneous …

Background—The Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
(FAME) 2 trial demonstrated a significant reduction in subsequent coronary …

Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
improved outcomes compared with an angiography-guided strategy in patients with …

Background There are limited studies on the cost-effectiveness of fractional flow reserve
(FFR)-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-based PCI …