In Epistemic Injustice Miranda Fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of
injustice in which someone is wronged specifically in his or her capacity as a knower …

This chapter discusses two distinct kinds of consideration that feature early in development–
the evidential and the interpersonal. It argues that children are responsive to a much wider …

Children are often perceived to be less credible testifiers than adults. Their inexperience and
affinity for play can provide reason to question their credibility and sincerity as truth tellers …

In her Epistemic Injustice (2007), Miranda Fricker argues that people can be distinctively
wronged in their capacity as knowers. Perhaps the most obvious type of epistemic injustice …

Miranda Fricker has introduced the insightful notion of epistemic injustice in the
philosophical debate, thus bridging concerns of social epistemology with questions that …

This article examines the primary epistemic harm of testimonial injustice, or, as defined by
Miranda Fricker, the injustice of perceiving another epistemic agent as less credible due to …

In our opening chapter we discussed the choice of Beyond listening as the title for this book
as reflecting certain ambivalence towards the term. But as we come to the end of the book …

Miranda Fricker's important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial
injustice and hermeneutic injustice. It explores how agents' capacities to make assertions …

Prejudice influences people's thoughts and behaviors in many ways; it can lead people to
underestimate others' credibility, to read anger or hysteria into their words, or to expect …

In this paper, I discuss rape myths and mythologies, their negative effects on rape and
sexual assault complainants, and how they prejudicially construct women qua women. The …