[HTML][HTML] Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence

Z Pennington, AK Ahmed, CA Molina… - Annals of …, 2018 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
One of the major determinants of surgical candidacy in patients with symptomatic spinal
metastases is the ability of the patient to tolerate the procedure-associated morbidity. In …

[HTML][HTML] Minimally invasive versus open surgery for spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

DE Hinojosa-Gonzalez, A Roblesgil-Medrano… - Asian Spine …, 2022 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bones are the third most common location for solid tumor metastasis affecting up to 10% of
patients with solid tumors. When the spine is involved, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae are …

A systematic review of the current role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the management of metastatic spine disease

CA Molina, ZL Gokaslan… - International Journal of …, 2011 - Wiley Online Library
Although increasingly aggressive decompression and resection methods have resulted in
improved outcomes for patients with metastatic spine disease, these aggressive surgeries …

Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis: a prospective propensity score-matched study

N Hansen-Algenstaedt, MK Kwan, P Algenstaedt… - Spine, 2017 - journals.lww.com
Objective. To compare the outcomes of minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional
open surgery for spinal metastasis patients. Summary of Background Data. There is lack of …

The potential of minimally invasive surgery to treat metastatic spinal disease versus open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

VM Lu, MA Alvi, A Goyal, P Kerezoudis, M Bydon - World neurosurgery, 2018 - Elsevier
Background and Objective Metastasis to the spinal column is a common feature of primary
tumors of the breast, prostate, lung, and other organs. Surgical intervention can be …

[HTML][HTML] Minimal access versus open spinal surgery in treating painful spine metastasis: a systematic review

Z Yang, Y Yang, Y Zhang, Z Zhang, Y Chen… - World Journal of …, 2015 - Springer
Study design The study design of this paper is a systematic review of literature published in
the recent 10 years. Objective It is the objective of this paper to compare the clinical efficacy …

A comparative study between minimally invasive spine surgery and traditional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis

X Zhu, J Lu, H Xu, Q Tang, G Song, C Deng, H Wu… - Spine, 2021 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A retrospective study was conducted. Objective. This study aims to compare
the perioperative outcomes of minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) and traditional open …

A retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive versus open surgical techniques in the treatment of spinal metastases

T Hikata, N Isogai, Y Shiono, H Funao… - Clinical Spine …, 2017 - journals.lww.com
Study Design: A retrospective cohort study. Objective: This study was conducted to assess
the invasiveness, efficacy, and safety of minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) for …

Minimal invasive surgery instrumented fusion versus conventional open surgical instrumented fusion for the treatment of spinal metastases: a systematic review and …

R Pranata, MA Lim, R Vania, TGB Mahadewa - World neurosurgery, 2021 - Elsevier
Objective In this study, we aimed to compare the minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
instrumented fusion±decompression versus conventional open surgery (COS) instrumented …

10-year trends in the surgical management of patients with spinal metastases: a scoping review

JM Orenday-Barraza, MJ Cavagnaro, MJ Avila… - World Neurosurgery, 2022 - Elsevier
Background Spinal metastases are present in approximately 20% of patients with cancer,
giving a risk for neurologic dysfunction and instability. In already frail patients, surgeons …