Systematic reviews (SR) are crucial in synthesizing and analyzing existing scientific
literature to inform evidence-based decision-making. However, traditional SR methods often …

In this commentary, we discuss ChatGPT and our perspectives on its utility to systematic
reviews (SRs) through the appropriateness and applicability of its responses to SR related …

Systematic reviews and metaanalyses, which involve thorough literature searches and
synthesis, are essential for evidence-based decisionmaking. With the growing number of …

Background There is growing interest in using machine learning approaches to priority rank
studies and reduce human burden in screening literature when conducting systematic …

The exponential increase in published articles makes a thorough and expedient review of
literature increasingly challenging. This review delineated automated tools and platforms …

Systematic reviews are a cornerstone of today's evidence‐informed decision making. With
the rapid expansion of questions to be addressed and scientific information produced, there …

Systematic reviews have become increasingly critical to informing healthcare policy;
however, they remain a time-consuming and labor-intensive activity. The extraction of data …

The increasing volume of research submissions to academic journals poses a significant
challenge for traditional peer-review processes. To address this issue, this study explores …

Objective: As the health care field moves towards evidence-based practice, it becomes ever
more critical to conduct systematic reviews of research literature for guiding programmatic …

Systematic literature reviews play a vital role in identifying the best available evidence for
health and social care research, policy, and practice. The resources required to produce …