Importance Both citation and funding metrics converge in shaping current perceptions of
academic success. Objective To evaluate what proportion of the most-cited US-based …

Purpose The authors evaluated publication and citation patterns for articles supported by
Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) hub investment over the first decade of …

Introduction: To enhance the performance evaluation of Clinical and Translational Science
Award (CTSA) hubs, we examined the utility of advanced bibliometric measures that go …

Rationale: Funding decisions for cardiovascular R01 grant applications at the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) largely hinge on percentile rankings. It is not known …

Objective To introduce the availability of grant-to-article linkage data associated with
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants and to perform a high-level analysis of the …

Rationale: We previously demonstrated absence of association between peer-review–
derived percentile ranking and raw citation impact in a large cohort of National Heart, Lung …

Research organizations are becoming more reliant on quantitative approaches to determine
how to recruit and promote researchers, allocate funding, and evaluate the impact of prior …

Importance Early-stage and established investigators compete for a limited supply of funds
from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Regardless of their previous funding success …

Importance Scientific publication is an important tool for knowledge dissemination and
career advancement, but authors affiliated with institutions in low-and middle-income …

Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators | PLOS Biology Skip
to main content Advertisement PLOS Biology Browse Current Issue Journal Archive Collections …