Recently, a number of philosophers have argued that we can and should “consequentialize”
non-consequentialist moral theories, putting them into a consequentialist framework. I argue …

The aim of the consequentializing project is to show that, for every plausible ethical theory,
there is a version of consequentialism that is extensionally equivalent to it. One challenge …

When I first became interested in moral philosophy, one of the themes I immediately picked
up on was the dispute between consequentialists and non-consequentialists. Their quarrel …

Consequentialism, many philosophers have claimed, asks too much of us to be a plausible
ethical theory. Indeed, the theory's severe demandingness is often claimed to be its chief …

To consequentialize a non‐consequentialist theory, take whatever considerations that the
non‐consequentialist theory holds to be relevant to determining the deontic statuses of …

Morality seems important, in the sense that there are practical reasons—at least for most of
us, most of the time—to be moral. A central theoretical motivation for consequentialism is …

In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either
consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that …

Historically, consequentialists have applied their theory to ever more sophisticated
axiologies in an attempt to bring consequentialism closer in line with our common-sense …

That many values can be consequentialized–incorporated into a ranking of states of affairs–
is often taken to support the view that apparent alternatives to consequentialism are in fact …

Consequentialist ethical theories have been an essential part of ethical, political, and legal
reasoning since before Jeremy Bentham advanced the theory of utilitarianism." …