Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
L Shamseer, D Moher, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Bmj, 2015 - bmj.com
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct …
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct …
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)
statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently …
statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently …
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …
[HTML][HTML] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
D Moher, L Shamseer, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Systematic reviews, 2015 - Springer
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well …
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well …
[HTML][HTML] Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a …
Abstract Background The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve
transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the …
transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the …
[HTML][HTML] Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors
D Moher, L Stewart, P Shekelle - Systematic reviews, 2016 - Springer
Systematic reviews have become very popular. A recent estimate suggests that 22 new
systematic reviews are published daily [1]. One reason for this interest is that they serve …
systematic reviews are published daily [1]. One reason for this interest is that they serve …
Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist
M Ballard, P Montgomery - Research synthesis methods, 2017 - Wiley Online Library
Objective To assess the conditions under which employing an overview of systematic
reviews is likely to lead to a high risk of bias. Study Design To synthesise existing guidance …
reviews is likely to lead to a high risk of bias. Study Design To synthesise existing guidance …
[HTML][HTML] How to properly use the PRISMA Statement
It has been more than a decade since the original publication of the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement [1], and it has …
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement [1], and it has …
[HTML][HTML] An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview
Background Overviews of systematic reviews are a relatively new approach to synthesising
evidence, and research methods and associated guidance are developing. Within this paper …
evidence, and research methods and associated guidance are developing. Within this paper …
Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists
Systematic reviews should be reported completely and accurately so that users can interpret
and appraise the review findings appropriately. In this commentary, we describe key …
and appraise the review findings appropriately. In this commentary, we describe key …