The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
AP Verhagen, HCW De Vet, RA De Bie… - Journal of clinical …, 1998 - Elsevier
Most systematic reviews rely substantially on the assessment of the methodological quality
of the individual trials. The aim of this study was to obtain consensus among experts about a …
of the individual trials. The aim of this study was to obtain consensus among experts about a …
[HTML][HTML] Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Background Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological
quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert …
quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert …
Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review
H Khalil, D Ameen, A Zarnegar - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective The objectives of this scoping review are to identify the reliability and validity of the
available tools, their limitations and any recommendations to further improve the use of …
available tools, their limitations and any recommendations to further improve the use of …
The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews
AP Verhagen, HCW De Vet, RA De Bie, M Boers… - Journal of clinical …, 2001 - Elsevier
The best evidence on the efficacy of medical interventions is provided by high-quality trials
summarized in high-quality systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The methodological …
summarized in high-quality systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The methodological …
Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed
A Dechartres, P Charles, S Hopewell, P Ravaud… - Journal of clinical …, 2011 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Many reviews specifically aimed to assess the quality of randomized controlled
trials (RCTs). We evaluated the quality of reporting in such reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND …
trials (RCTs). We evaluated the quality of reporting in such reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND …
Assessing “best evidence”: issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews
KN Lohr, TS Carey - The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 1999 - Elsevier
Article-at-a-Glance Background Evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines,
quality and value of health services, and science-based decision making are becoming …
quality and value of health services, and science-based decision making are becoming …
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic …
X Zeng, Y Zhang, JSW Kwong, C Zhang… - Journal of evidence …, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
Objective To systematically review the methodological assessment tools for pre‐clinical and
clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline …
clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline …
[HTML][HTML] The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar
Objectives To compare the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by
authors from China and those from the United States (USA). Study Design and Setting From …
authors from China and those from the United States (USA). Study Design and Setting From …
Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned
P Herbison, J Hay-Smith, WJ Gillespie - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2006 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: To find if a particular quality score was better than others at validly scoring the
quality of randomized controlled trials, both by examining the consistency of dividing studies …
quality of randomized controlled trials, both by examining the consistency of dividing studies …
[HTML][HTML] Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? | PLOS
Medicine Skip to main content Advertisement PLOS Medicine Browse Current Issue Journal …
Medicine Skip to main content Advertisement PLOS Medicine Browse Current Issue Journal …