Network meta‐analysis (NMA) is an extension of pairwise meta‐analysis (PMA) which
combines evidence from trials on multiple treatments in connected networks. NMA delivers …

There are often multiple potential interventions to treat a disease; therefore, we need a
method for simultaneously comparing and ranking all of these available interventions. In …

Mixed treatment comparison (MTC)(also called network meta‐analysis) is an extension of
traditional meta‐analysis to allow the simultaneous pooling of data from clinical trials …

Network meta-analyses and mixed treatment comparisons represent the uppermost level in
the evidence hierarchy for decision making, in medicine as well as in other scholarly fields …

Network meta-analysis (NMA) as the quantification of pairwise meta-analysis in a network
format has been of particular interest to medical researchers in recent years. As a powerful …

Network meta‐analysis (NMA) is an established method for assessing the comparative
efficacy and safety of competing interventions. It is often the case that we deal with …

Pairwise meta‐analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from
multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific …

Network meta-analysis, in the context of a systematic review, is a meta-analysis in which
multiple treatments (that is, three or more) are being compared using both direct …

Network meta-analysis aims to compare multiple interventions by synthesizing studies
where each study compares only some of the interventions. This chapter explains how direct …

Randomized control trials and its meta-analysis has occupied the pinnacle in levels of
evidence available for research. However, there were several limitations of these trials …