We recently suggested in TREE that recent elements of invasion biology discourse might be
categorised as cases of more general science denialism [1]. We did not intend to be …

Several authors have recently argued that invasion biologists should adopt a more objective
and dispassionate stance towards invasive species. Brown and Sax (Austral Ecol 29: 530 …

Russell and Blackburn's [1] call to action against 'invasive species denialism'appears to be
invasion biology's desperate last stand. Invasion biologists' insistence that species …

Leading invasion biologists sometimes dismiss critics and criticisms of their field by invoking
“the straw man” fallacy. Critics of invasion biology are also labelled as a small group of …

Science denialism retards evidenced‐based policy and practice and should be challenged.
It has been a particular concern for mitigating global environmental issues, such as …

This paper offers a defense against ad hominem aspersions cast in this journal by Ricciardi
and Ryan (Biol Invasions 20 (3): 549–553, 2018) who allege that several articles I wrote …

Scientific consensus on the negative impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) is increasingly
being challenged. Whereas informed scepticism of impacts is important, science denialism …

Sax et al.[1] argue that invasion biologists should more systematically consider positive
impacts of non-native species to 'people and nature'. They state that research has been …

Let's welcome a variety of voices to invasion biology Page 1 Letter Let’s welcome a
variety of voices to invasion biology In 2017, Russell and Blackburn (2017a) referred to some …

In the last decades, thousands of investigations confirmed the detrimental effects of species
translocated by man outside of their native ranges (nonindigenous species, or NIS) …