[PDF][PDF] Validity and reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - JAMA …, 2015 - jamanetwork.com
Importance To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National
Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common …

[PDF][PDF] Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

2015 - academia.edu
OBJECTIVE To assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of
PRO-CTCAE items. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 975 adults with …

[HTML][HTML] Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - JAMA …, 2015 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes
Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) - PMC Back to …

[PDF][PDF] Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - JAMA, 2015 - scholar.archive.org
Abstract Importance—Symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer trials are currently
reported by clinicians using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology …

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - JAMA …, 2015 - cdr.lib.unc.edu
Symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer trials are currently reported by clinicians using
the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events …

[引用][C] Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - JAMA Oncology, 2015 - cir.nii.ac.jp
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version
of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) | CiNii Research CiNii …

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell… - JAMA …, 2015 - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Importance To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National
Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common …

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell, BB Reeve… - 2015 - hero.epa.gov
Importance: To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National
Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common …

[PDF][PDF] Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO …

2015 - researchgate.net
OBJECTIVE To assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of
PRO-CTCAE items. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 975 adults with …

Validity and reliability of the us national cancer institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

AC Dueck, TR Mendoza, SA Mitchell… - JAMA …, 2015 - mayoclinic.pure.elsevier.com
IMPORTANCE To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the
National Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common …