[HTML][HTML] Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework
Background Prognosis research aims to identify factors associated with the course of health
conditions. It is often challenging to judge the overall quality of research evidence in …
conditions. It is often challenging to judge the overall quality of research evidence in …
Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews
Background: To provide valid assessments of answers to prognostic questions, systematic
reviews must appraise the quality of the available evidence. However, no standard quality …
reviews must appraise the quality of the available evidence. However, no standard quality …
GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different …
Objective The objective of this study was to provide guidance on the use of the Grading of
Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to …
Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to …
[HTML][HTML] Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?
Background Prognostic factors are associated with the risk of a subsequent outcome in
people with a given disease or health condition. Meta-analysis using individual participant …
people with a given disease or health condition. Meta-analysis using individual participant …
[图书][B] Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context
The second edition of this best-selling book has been thoroughly revised and expanded to
reflect the significant changes and advances made in systematic reviewing. New features …
reflect the significant changes and advances made in systematic reviewing. New features …
Using systematic reviews in guideline development: the GRADE approach
HJ Schünemann - … Reviews in Health Research: Meta‐Analysis …, 2022 - Wiley Online Library
Systematic reviews are essential to produce trustworthy guidelines. To assess the body of
evidence included in a systematic review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment …
evidence included in a systematic review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment …
GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness
Abstract Objectives The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and
Evaluation (GRADE) working group defines patient values and preferences as the relative …
Evaluation (GRADE) working group defines patient values and preferences as the relative …
[HTML][HTML] Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research
In the second article in the PROGRESS series on prognostic factor research, Sara Schroter
and colleagues discuss the role of prognostic factors in current clinical practice, randomised …
and colleagues discuss the role of prognostic factors in current clinical practice, randomised …
[HTML][HTML] Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group
Background A number of approaches have been used to grade levels of evidence and the
strength of recommendations. The use of many different approaches detracts from one of the …
strength of recommendations. The use of many different approaches detracts from one of the …
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of
Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating …
Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating …